Editing
Appendix/Ramblings/ForCohlHoward
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Our Choice, Historically=== Over the past four decades, the nonrelativistic fluid simulations that have been performed by LSU's astrophysics group have been carried out using various renditions of an ''explicit'' <b>Finite-Volume Method</b>. The explicit FVM method was chosen primarily because … <ol> <li> It was the method to which I was introduced by my [[Appendix/Ramblings/MyDoctoralStudents#Years_1976_-_1978|doctoral dissertation advisors]], Peter Bodenheimer and David Black, that was considered appropriate to the type of fluid-flows problems that were the focus of my dissertation research. Note that Bodenheimer is the first author of the book that is [[#Joel%27s_Opening_Comments|referenced above]] as [[Appendix/References#BLRY07|<font color="red">BLRY07</font>]]. </li> <li> Time-integration is fairly straightforward because all terms (except the time derivative) are specified entirely in terms of the current (as opposed to advanced) time. </li> <li> The nonlinear ''advection'' term on the LHS is written in a way that guarantees global momentum conservation, if the ''source'' terms on the RHS of the Euler equation sum to zero. </li> <li> The amount of computer time that is required to take each step forward in time is typically much smaller when using an ''explicit'' as opposed to ''implicit'' integration scheme. </li> </ol> A major disadvantage of our decades-old, explicit-FVM approach is that, in order for the scheme to be numerically stable, roughly speaking each integration time-step <math>\Delta t</math> must be smaller than the smallest value of the ratio, <math>\Delta x/c_s</math>, as determined across the entire grid, where <math>\Delta x</math> is the grid spacing and <math>c_s</math> is the fluid sound-speed. (Note that <math>\Delta t</math> is essentially the sound-crossing time across the smallest grid cell.) This constraint on the integration time-step is computationally burdensome when attempting to employ a high-resolution (small <math>\Delta x</math>) grid and/or when attempting to model environments where the fluid is relatively hot and therefore characterized by a high sound speed. Even worse, <b>it is ''impossible'' to model the evolution of ''incompressible'' fluids using an explicit-FVM scheme</b> because, in effect in such fluids, sound travels at an infinite speed; that is, <math>c_s = \infty</math> so <math>\Delta t</math> goes to zero.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to JETohlineWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
JETohlineWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Tiled Menu
Table of Contents
Old (VisTrails) Cover
Appendices
Variables & Parameters
Key Equations
Special Functions
Permissions
Formats
References
lsuPhys
Ramblings
Uploaded Images
Originals
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information