Editing
ThreeDimensionalConfigurations/Challenges
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Equation of Continuity==== In steady state, <math>~\partial (\rho\bold{u})/\partial t = 0</math>. Hence the rotating-frame-based continuity equation becomes, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\nabla \cdot (\rho\bold{u})</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~0 \, .</math> </td> </tr> </table> If we insist that the momentum-density vector be expressible in terms of the curl of a vector — for example, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho\bold{u}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~\nabla \times \boldsymbol{\mathfrak{J}} \, ,</math> </td> </tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="3">[https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6650/ Saied W. Andalib (1998)], §4.1, p. 80, Eq. (4.1) </td></tr> </table> then satisfying this steady-state continuity equation is guaranteed because the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities#Divergence_of_curl_is_zero divergence of a curl is always zero]. "<font color="orange">The task</font> of satisfying the steady-state equation of continuity <font color="orange">then shifts to identifying an appropriate expression for the vector potential, <math>~\boldsymbol{\mathfrak{J}} \, .</math></font>" In the most general case, in terms of this vector potential the three Cartesian components of the momentum-density vector are, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho u_x</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_z}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_y}{\partial z} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho u_y</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_x}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_z}{\partial x} \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho u_z</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_y}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_x}{\partial y} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> Here, <font color="red">we will follow Andalib's lead and only look for fluid flows with no vertical motions</font>. That is to say, we will set <math>~\rho u_z = 0</math>, in which case this last expression establishes the constraint, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_y}{\partial x}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_x}{\partial y} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> "<font color="orange">A general solution to this equation can be found only if there exists a scalar function <math>~\Gamma(x, y, z)</math> such that …</font>" <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\mathfrak{J}_y = \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial y}</math> </td> <td align="center"> and, </td> <td align="left"> <math>~\mathfrak{J}_x = \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial x} \, ;</math> </td> </tr> </table> note that this adopted functional behavior works because the constraint becomes, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\frac{\partial^2 \Gamma}{\partial x \partial y}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~\frac{\partial^2 \Gamma}{\partial y \partial x} \, .</math> </td> </tr> </table> Hence, the expressions for the x- and y-components of the momentum-density vector may be rewritten, respectively, as, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho u_x</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_z}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \biggl[ \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial y} \biggr] = + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\biggl[ \mathfrak{J}_z - \frac{\partial\Gamma}{\partial z} \biggr] \, ; </math> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho u_y</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \frac{\partial }{\partial z}\biggl[ \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial x} \biggr] - \frac{\partial \mathfrak{J}_z}{\partial x} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\biggl[ \mathfrak{J}_z - \frac{\partial\Gamma}{\partial z} \biggr] \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> If we again <font color="red">follow Andalib's lead and only look for models in which the x-y-plane flow is independent of the vertical coordinate, z</font>, then, <font color="orange"><math>~\mathfrak{J}_z</math> and <math>~\partial\Gamma/\partial z</math> must be functions of x and y only. Therefore, <math>~\mathfrak{J}_z</math> is independent of z and <math>~\Gamma</math> is at most linear in z.</font> Now, rather than focusing on the determination of <math>~\Gamma(x,y)</math>, we can just as well define the scalar function, <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\Psi(x,y)</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~\equiv</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \mathfrak{J}_z - \frac{\partial\Gamma}{\partial z} \, , </math> </td> </tr> </table> in which case "<font color="orange">… the components of the momentum density may be written as:</font>" <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> <tr> <td align="right"> <math>~\rho \bold{u}</math> </td> <td align="center"> <math>~=</math> </td> <td align="left"> <math>~ \boldsymbol{\hat\imath} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial y} - \boldsymbol{\hat\jmath} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \, . </math> </td> </tr> </table> It is straightforward to demonstrate that this expression for the momentum-density vector does satisfy the steady-state continuity equation. "<font color="orange">The function <math>~\Psi(x, y)</math> will serve a similar role as the velocity potential for incompressible fluids.</font>"
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to JETohlineWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
JETohlineWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Tiled Menu
Table of Contents
Old (VisTrails) Cover
Appendices
Variables & Parameters
Key Equations
Special Functions
Permissions
Formats
References
lsuPhys
Ramblings
Uploaded Images
Originals
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information