<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://selfgravitatingfluids.education/JETohline/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3ALSU_CT99CommonTheme1B</id>
	<title>Template:LSU CT99CommonTheme1B - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://selfgravitatingfluids.education/JETohline/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3ALSU_CT99CommonTheme1B"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://selfgravitatingfluids.education/JETohline/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme1B&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T15:41:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://selfgravitatingfluids.education/JETohline/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme1B&amp;diff=1396&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Joel2: Created page with &quot;[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many &#039;&#039;thin rings&#039;&#039; &amp;#8212; with &lt;math&gt;~\delta M(\varpi^&#039;, z^&#039;)&lt;/math&gt;  being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring e...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://selfgravitatingfluids.education/JETohline/index.php?title=Template:LSU_CT99CommonTheme1B&amp;diff=1396&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-06-21T23:44:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many &amp;#039;&amp;#039;thin rings&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta M(\varpi^&amp;#039;, z^&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring e...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many &amp;#039;&amp;#039;thin rings&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;#8212; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta M(\varpi^&amp;#039;, z^&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring element &amp;amp;#8212; that are positioned at various meridional coordinate locations throughout the mass distribution.  According to Stahler&amp;#039;s derivation, for example (see his equation 11 and the explanatory text that follows it), the differential contribution to the potential, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta\Phi_g(\varpi, z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, due to each differential mass element is:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta\Phi_g(\varpi,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~=&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;td align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~&lt;br /&gt;
- \biggl[\frac{2G}{\pi }\biggr] \frac{\delta M}{[(\varpi + \varpi^&amp;#039;)^2 + (z^&amp;#039; - z)^2]^{1 / 2}}&lt;br /&gt;
\times K\biggl\{ \biggl[ \frac{4\varpi^&amp;#039; \varpi}{(\varpi +\varpi^&amp;#039;)^2 + (z^&amp;#039; - z)^2} \biggr]^{1 / 2} \biggr\} \, .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Stahler&amp;#039;s expression for each &amp;#039;&amp;#039;thin ring&amp;#039;&amp;#039; contribution is a generalization of the above-highlighted Key Equation expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\Phi_\mathrm{TR}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:  The &amp;quot;TR&amp;quot; expression assumes that the ring cuts through the  meridional plane at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~(\varpi^&amp;#039;, z^&amp;#039;) = (a, 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, while Stahler&amp;#039;s expression works for individual rings that cut through the meridional plane at any coordinate location.  Given that, in cylindrical coordinates, the differential mass element is, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta M = \rho(\varpi^&amp;#039;, z^&amp;#039;) \varpi^&amp;#039; d\varpi^&amp;#039; dz^&amp;#039;  \int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi = 2\pi \rho(\varpi^&amp;#039;, z^&amp;#039;) \varpi^&amp;#039; d\varpi^&amp;#039; dz^&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
it is easy to see that Stahler&amp;#039;s expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;~\delta \Phi_g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is identical to the integrand of the expression that we have [[#Part_I|identified, above]], as providing (Version 1 of) the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gravitational Potential of an Axisymmetric Mass Distribution.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; It is therefore clear that &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] were developing robust algorithms to numerically evaluate the gravitational potential of systems with axisymmetric mass distributions well before [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527...86C Cohl &amp;amp;amp; Tohline (1999)] formally derived the corresponding Key integral expression&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note:  It appears as though both [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] only adopted this approach to evaluating the gravitational potential at locations &amp;#039;&amp;#039;outside&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of an axisymmetric mass distribution, whereas [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527...86C Cohl &amp;amp;amp; Tohline (1999)] have shown that the approach applies as well for locations &amp;#039;&amp;#039;inside&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the mass distribution.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Joel2</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>